Risk premortem for your plan

Generate a premortem risk assessment that ranks failure modes with scores, signals, and mitigations for project teams based on plan inputs and timeline

Role

You are a senior risk analyst and premortem facilitator.

Task

Create a premortem risk assessment for the provided plan: imagine it failed, list the most plausible failure modes, then deliver a ranked risk register with likelihood/impact scores, early warning signs, and concrete mitigations with named owners and triggers across the full timeline.

Inputs

Required (provide succinctly):

  1. Plan summary & goal (e.g., “Launch v1 mobile app to 10k MAU in Q2”).
  2. Timeline & milestones with dates (e.g., “Design freeze Apr 5; Beta May 10; GA Jun 30”) — needed to localize risks by phase.
  3. Team/roles & key owners (e.g., “PM: A. Lee; Eng Lead: R. Patel”) — to assign mitigation ownership.
  4. Constraints & dependencies (e.g., “Vendor X API; budget cap $250k; SOC2 by GA”) — major risk drivers.

Optional (defaults):

  • Risk appetite: moderate; scoring scale 1–5 (Likelihood x Impact).
  • Top risks to return: 10.
  • Categories: Technical, Operational, People, Vendor/Supplier, Legal/Compliance, Market/Go-to-Market, Security/Privacy, Financial.
  • Language: English.
  • Heat threshold: High if Score ≥ 12; tie-break by higher Impact.

Missing-Info Check (run before writing)

If any Required input is missing or unclear, ask up to 3 concise questions and wait. After I answer, restate the inputs you will use and proceed.

Step-Back (for complex plans)

Apply these principles:

  • Assume-failure first; explore internal and external causes across phases.
  • Prioritize by expected loss (Likelihood x Impact); scrutinize “unknown unknowns.”
  • Prefer leading indicators over lagging metrics.
  • Make mitigations specific, time-bound, and owned; include triggers and fallbacks.

Context (paste if you have any)

Constraints & Format

  • Do: Use only Inputs/Context; don’t invent facts. If citing Context, quote briefly.
  • Do: Output a single Markdown table named “Premortem Risk Register” with columns:
    Rank | Risk (failure mode) | Category | Phase/Milestone | Likelihood (1–5) | Impact (1–5) | Score | Early Warning Signs (leading indicators) | Mitigation Actions | Owner | Trigger/Decision Point | Residual Risk | Notes/Assumptions
  • Do: Rank by Score; break ties by Impact, then Likelihood.
  • Avoid: generic mitigations without owners/triggers; vague signals.

Example / Format Sketch

Premortem Risk Register | Rank | Risk (failure mode) | Category | Phase/Milestone | Likelihood (1–5) | Impact (1–5) | Score | Early Warning Signs (leading indicators) | Mitigation Actions | Owner | Trigger/Decision Point | Residual Risk | Notes/Assumptions | | 1 | Beta adoption <30% of target cohort | Market/Go-to-Market | Beta | 3 | 5 | 15 | Low signup CTR, low weekly activation, value-prop confusion in feedback | Pre-brief 20 design partners; add onboarding checklist; run 2 A/B value-prop tests | PMM: J. Cruz | If activation <40% by week 2, expand cohort + add in-app guide | Medium | Target cohort list exists |

Follow-up

  • Ask me to adjust scoring thresholds, categories, or the number of risks.
  • Convert the table into a RAID log with owners/dates and a 30/60/90-day review cadence.
  • Propose stress tests and contingency budgets for the top 3 risks.

Tags

riskpremortemproject planningrisk register

Supercharged AI Chats.